2024 Tesla Cybertruck

Front drivers seat moves under hard turning. clicking noises and the feeling that the seat is either shifted left or right depending on direction of last sharp turn. tesla has admitted it’s a design defect after 4th attempt to fix. 2 different technicians test drove the vehicle and confirmed the issue; online cybertruck forums discuss the problem as well. problem apparent immediately after purchase. i’m concerned that the sear will not hold up as designed in an accident

I am reporting a safety defect on my 2024 tesla cybertruck related to recall 25v170 (cant rail panel detachment hazard). tesla has confirmed in writing that no remedy is available for my vin, and they canceled my scheduled service appointment due to this. i explicitly requested that my appointment not be canceled because i felt unsafe driving the vehicle. i also disclosed my safety concerns to tesla, explaining that this is my primary mode of transportation. despite my follow-ups, tesla provided no timeline for repair, leaving me without a safe vehicle. this recall involves a structural panel that may detach while driving, creating a serious road hazard and risk of injury to me and others. tesla’s inability to fix or address this defect in a timely manner violates federal recall law (49 u.s.c. § 30120(c)). i request that nhtsa investigate this issue and ensure tesla provides a timely remedy or refund.

While driving with tesla's full self-driving (fsd) system engaged, my vehicle struck two standard traffic cones in a clearly marked construction zone. the system failed to detect the cones or make any evasive action. i have video evidence of the incident. the situation was extremely dangerous. the cones could easily have been construction workers, pedestrians, or something more severe. i hesitated to intervene because it happened in a split second, and i was trusting the system to respond — which it completely failed to do. in that moment, i was also faced with a difficult choice: swerve and potentially cause a more serious accident, or trust that fsd would navigate correctly. it didn’t. the impact caused damage to my vehicle. when i brought it to tesla, the technician dismissed my concern, laughed, and sarcastically told me, “there’s no way we’re paying for it.” he said it was my responsibility to avoid the cones — even while fsd was fully engaged. that kind of response is unacceptable, especially when tesla markets this system as being capable of handling real-world driving environments like construction zones. this incident shows a significant failure in tesla’s fsd recognition and decision-making systems. there were no warnings or alerts prior to the impact. the event raises major safety concerns, not only for the driver but for anyone on or near the road. i’m reporting this because i believe tesla's current version of fsd has critical deficiencies that could lead to injury or worse. the system should never ignore basic road hazards like cones, and the company's dismissive response after the fact is alarming.

At highway speeds (typically between 70–80 mph), the driver’s side door of my tesla cybertruck begins to visibly vibrate and emit wind noise. the vibration is strong enough that i can see the door flexing from inside the cabin. it is not subtle — it shakes to the point that i’ve become genuinely concerned for my safety. at times, it feels unstable enough that i worry the door could detach, which could lead to a serious accident or even death. it is scary, and no vehicle should behave this way at normal highway speeds. i have returned to the tesla service center seven times for this issue. during my most recent visit, a technician was finally able to reproduce and confirm the problem. i greatly appreciate that the local manager is now taking it seriously, but up until this point, i’ve repeatedly been told “it’s normal,” which it absolutely is not. from what i’ve gathered online, many other cybertruck owners have reported similar experiences. some mention a service bulletin and a bracket fix, but i have not received a definitive solution despite the repeated visits. no warning lights or system messages appear when this happens, and the issue only occurs at high speeds. this vehicle has been inspected numerous times by tesla technicians, but the vibration remains unresolved. i’m reporting this because i believe it reflects a design or manufacturing defect, and i’m deeply concerned about the safety implications if this issue is not addressed.

Accelerator pedal slipped and lodged in trim making vehicle pin the acceleration pedal to the floor.

While driving vehicle a prompt flashed on the screen saying “power reduced, steering performance reduced due to overheating”. then the next screen said “critical steering issue detected pull over”. then i got a loss of system redundancy detected. this has happened twice in one week and i’ve towed it to tesla twice.

Mothe air suspension is stuck saying it cannot adjust. the car states that there is an electrical issue. as an electric car electrical issues seems to be a concerning error message to receive. the service center has stated a part was replaced two times but the error message remains. the error is in reference to exhausting from the valve block. this removes the ability to utilize any of the adjustments and potential water wade mode. the service center said a redesign is in the works, but no such redesign is in the works.

I purchased 2024 tesla cybertruck and got the delivery of the truck on may 11th 2024. one the very first day i experienced a critical warning that stated " critical steering issue detected" and it started beeping loudly and i was unable to steer it. now i am unable to drive the car as i have a whole lust of critical alerts that pop up on the screen. i am concerned about my safety and others on the road. one of the warning says "loss of system redundancy detected. unable to shift out of park because vehicle has detected loss of redundancy. the vehicle may suddenly lose electrical power, steering and propulsion, and maybe unable to apply the parking break." i tried contacting tesla emergency roadside support and they just keep me on hold and i am unable to reach a real person. i tried scheduling a service appointment but these warnings are critical and is a potential safety concern.

Rear trim piece missing clips, flaps in the wind, others have had theirs fly off

Un known lt285/65r20 123/120h dot [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

Windshield wiper failed without any warning. doesn’t work and it’s raining

Contacted tesla on june 25th for their june 19th recall (24v-456 and 24v-457) and they responded that my truck isn't (yet) on their list of recalled cars even though it's been 6 days since the voluntary recall happened. as tesla has been the one to initiate the recall, i would have assumed my truck would instantly in the list. appointments are booked out weeks in advance, and tesla won't allow me to create an appointment now.

Driving at approximately 70miles an hour on a divided highway and the top right plastic trim between the back window and the steel side came loose and flew off into traffic behind me creating a road hazard for other motorists. i drove back and picked up the shattered pieces off the highway, no incident was filed with the authorities since there was no accident. i’ve scheduled a service appointment to replace the trim.

Large driver's touchscreen in the cybertruck gets really, really hot. brought it to tesla for a service today (august 5th, 2024) and they said the screen is working as expected. they showed me another vehicle and it also had the 110 to 125 degree screen. this can burn skin if you're older and lacking nerves or a child (which tesla encourages to use the screen with their video games). as this is a design defect and not a one-off part issue, i'd personally like to see this recalled. there are other people complaining about the same issue on this very new vehicle -- [xxx] worth noting that this high temperature is produced in the lower center area of the screen. tesla service says it's due to the computer processor being located in that area with no way for the heat to dissipate (ie, a tv would have room behind it to dissipate the heat, but the cybertruck has that area blocked). information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

Brand new car. no accident. the front and rear passenger doors noted to be misaligned from beginning (with sharp edges). it’s a hazard. tesla says nothing they can do about it. unacceptable.

Received a “critical error” message on the screen and was advised to pull over. after doing so and putting the vehicle in “park” i was unable to take the vehicle out of park or move it at all. this would have been very dangerous if it occurred in an unsafe neighborhood or busy highway. couldn’t even take it out of park for the tow truck driver to get it onto the flatbed so he had to use “skates” to pull it onto the truck. there were many different error messages appearing on the screen related to different systems in the car so i suspect some sort of electrical defect caused multiple systems to fail simultaneously. i uploaded a couple of pics of some of the messages below.

We were driving on the freeway yesterday september 3rd at 9:30pm and my passenger side door swung open while on the entrance ramp to highway 24. my infant was sitting in that passenger side in her carseat and thankfully she wasnt injured. a car could have collided with that door or it could have hit anything outside resulting in extreme damage, injury, or death. upon inspection of the door latch, the door latch is almost completely unhinged. the screw cam off, and the latch simply swivels and does not lock the door or hold it in place. we had to drive home with our hand physically holding the door closed. my driver side door also seems to not be fully latching - though it is not in as bad condition. but upon driving it, you can feel an airgap with the sound at higher speeds which suggests to me that this door latch is also at extreme risk of failure. these two doors are the only ones commonly used by us. but given they are both seemingly failing, my guess is that all four door latches are defective and at immediate risk of causing harm, injury, or death to those cybertrucks on the road with the same latch.

Took vehicle in for service they replace the wiper motor under warranty with the faulty one that is more unsafe than the previous one. and they refuse to fix it. research shows they knew about this for months, yet continue to risk owners safety by replacing working units with faulty ones. then have it taken or leave an attitude.

The windshield wiper was replaced under recall with a faulty wiper that is actually more dangerous than the original and tesla is known about this issue for months and haven't corrected it or stopped replacing working units with faulty ones. please help with this issue before someone gets injured or killed by their negligence. i have made multiple attempts with tesla service and tried all their contacts and am getting zero resolutions. thanks

Cyber truck does not have a center high mounted signal lamp and higher than the other 2 rear lamps.

1. chmsl requirement: fmvss no. 108 mandates a center high-mounted stop lamp (chmsl) on passenger vehicles, typically a single lamp centered and positioned above the rear stop lamps. in cases where design constraints prevent a single chmsl, two identical lamps are permissible, provided they are symmetrically mounted above the other stop lamps. 2. cybertruck's rear light bar: the cybertruck’s rear light bar does not appear to comply with this standard, as it presents a continuous light bar rather than a distinct, centrally mounted chmsl or two identical, high-mounted stop lamps.

While driving at night on autopilot last night on the highway, the frunk opened. it blocked our view, luckily it was not busy on the highway and we were able to pull to the side it took multiple attempts to close it back again

Nhtsa has created a safety risk by forcing fsd to have extreme monitoring. while in fsd i have to go back to normal driving to change the station on the radio or look at my phone. this is something i do in my non fsd vehicles all the time. the reason for me purchasing fsd is to be safer. your ridiculous overreach may actually kill me.the entire purpose is to reduce distracted driving, yet your ridiculous rules force an unsafe environment. i hope whoever pushed these restrictions realizes they are accountable for the crashes and deaths they create for forcing people out of fsd.

The headlight design, being behind and slightly above the front bumper, allows snow to accumulate in front of the headlights while parked and while driving. this prevents visibility in low-light conditions for both the vehicle driver and for other drivers.

When driving in snow, the snow accumilates in front of the recessed headlights on top of the front bumper and makes night driving impossible.

When driving during a snow storm, the headlights of the cyberteuck become covered in snow and ice. the main headlights that produce most of the light are just under the frunk in an inset groove. because of the nature of the design it catches snow it collects in that location. because of the led headlights there’s not enough heat to melt away the snow. at night your lights slowly fade away until you can barely see anything. photo is not my vehicle but my friend’s who reported same problem.

On saturday, [xxx], vehicle was at a t-intersection, in normal drive mode (not fsd) waiting for traffic to pass to enter roadway from side road. vehicle suddenly started to go backwards. had to press on the brake to stop. rebooted the car and the error happened again. tried to reverse from the intersection to be able to stop the vehicle in a safe location, but steering (drive by wire) was not working. had to drive with one foot on the brake and one on the electronic throttle to go backwards, even though vehicle was in drive model. display read 'traction control disabled', 'adaptive rider control degraded', 'stability control disabled', and 'emergency braking not available'. tesla service was requested and vehicle was transported to tesla facility in tampa. i am very concerned that had this failure occurred while on interstate could have resulted in a serious accident. information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

I was driving in a rain storm and the wiper started to malfunction. would only clean half the windshield. then shut off completely. made a weird noise and started smoking in the front.started working for on wipe then did a 360 on front end of the car. wiper blade flew off and wiper arm would not stay in position. was able to get home but had to get the car towed to tesla.

The newest tesla vehicles coming out of the factory with an unannounced hw4 computer upgrade, dubbed ai4.1, are seeing them short-circuit and die down shortly after purchase. in some case, the new ai4 computer gives up the ghost after several hundred miles, rendering not only the fsd feature, but the cameras and gps navigation hence range estimates unavailable, too. i believe it's a safety defect and the vin was used to be able to submit the form, it seems to affect most new tesla vehicles. thank you

During back camera was covered with rain, rear view was totally blind bec of rain drops. it's unsafe with rain and back camera totally covered with rain drop

The contact owned a 2024 tesla cybertruck equipped with pirelli tires, tire line: scorpion atr, tire size: 285/65/r20, dot number: n/a. the contact stated that while driving at 70 mph, he heard a loud bang, and the vehicle veered to the left. no warning light was illuminated. the contact attempted to steer right, but the vehicle failed to respond. the vehicle struck another vehicle in the left lane before both vehicles crashed into the median barrier wall. the contact's vehicle then spun into three right lanes and came to a complete stop on the right shoulder. the air bags were deployed. upon inspection, the contact discovered that the rear driver's side rim was fractured. the contact and three passengers were taken to the hospital via ambulance. the contact sustained third-degree burns on his arms as a result of the air bag deployment. the second passenger had cuts on the head from the seat belt. the third passenger had cuts and bruises on the face from the seat belt. the fourth passenger sustained no injuries. a police report was filed and stated that the failure was caused by the rear driver's side tire blowout. the vehicle was towed to a tow yard and was deemed totaled by the insurance company. the manufacturer was not made aware of the failure, but the contact obtained the event data report and summary. the failure mileage was approximately 8,504.

While driving my cybertruck on freeway using tesla's fsd (full self driving). vehicle suddenly accelerated, got out of control and crashed in to the railing. luckly i was able to control after thr crash and drove it safe location. truck is severely damaged and tesla is not responding to my complaint. we nearly got killed. please help.

When any salt or other road debris is present on the windshield, the windshield wiper along with the washer fluid does not clean the windshield. instead the windshield visibility is worse leading to low visibility. overall i believe there are two flaws: 1. the wiper does not have enough downward force to keep enough contact with the windshield 2. when you attempt to clean using the washer fluid spray there is not enough washer fluid sprayed onto the windshield. instead the amount is so low that it leads to additional streaking causing additional visibility issues. due to this anytime i drive with salt on the roads i am at an increase risk to any issues that can occur during lower visibility while driving. many others have also reported the same behavior [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

The wiper will not clear the windshield it only smears and leaves streaks causing visibility issues. the automated wiping feature also does not operate properly and it will wildly wipe at high speed with nothing on the window and then do nothing when it is covered in water and road dirt. it will also dry wipe for no reason and smear what ever is on the window causing a visibility issue and then with the unfortunate combination of poor washer fluid output and poor blade contact it cannot clean the windshield properly. to be clear, it does not just take awhile to clean, it cannot clean the window regardless of how long you use the wiper wash function. it is a complete failure and i cannot get tesla to address it. i made an appointment dec. 6th for jan. 31st (first available) and it was pushed, with no reason, to feb 27th. after my current business trip, i will be discontinuing driving the vehicle if there is any chance of bad weather, it is that bad of an visibility issue and would be as unsafe as me driving without my glasses, looking through streaks and haze obscure important details i feel i cannot see the roadway good enough to operate the cybertruck safely.

When driving in a winter storm, headlights quickly become snow packed rendering them useless. this is extremely dangerous driving in any snowstorm at night. the light bar does not provide sufficient visibility at night and also can become ice packed.

On [xxx], while driving highways for over 2 hours, the windshield became very dirty with dried debris from the road. i activated the window cleaning function on the steering wheel ( for the first time) and could not clear the dirt from the passenger side. i tried many times, but no result. the drivers side did clean acceptably. but not the passenger side! i could see arcs on the windshield where the wiper attempted to drop fluid. there were 8 or 9 such arcs left after the wiper withdrew. i did see cleaning solvent near the outside of the windshield. but i could not see out of the windshield. reported same to teslas customer svc and a service visit was scheduled for jan. 8, 2025. by this time i had manually cleaned the window and verified the solvent well was full. svc agent said, no one else complaining and system is operating 100% as designed. experienced same situation again on [xxx]. customer svc again scheduled an on site svc call for feb 7 2025. i then saw on facebook, over 50 other people complaining of exactly the same problem. most had tried svc and heard the same informational as i. some included photos of the problem, some had their wiper or pump replaced, other e told that tesla was planning an ota update to cure the problem. i did a walk-in to svc on jan 27,2025, and was told there is no guidance from corporate on this matter and that as far as they knew, corporate was not aware of the problem. i'll keep my appointment on fri and hopefully i'll have some relief. i hate not seeing things coming from my right side! information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

Upper passanger trim piece fell off while driving on street, could have hurt another motorist. when new piece was fixed by tesla service center, i advised them to replace drivers side just in case and they stated they will not be able to until it falls off. this trim comes in two pieces, one is bolted to the truck and the other is glued onto the bolted piece, the glued piece peeled off. here is a youtube video showing in more detail the problem. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

On [xxx], i was driving my cybertruck on highway, at speed 55mph. the stainless panel on driver side, the one, on top of the windows, suddenly start falling off. this is the first winter for cybertruck. the stainless panel is hard and sharp enough to hit other cars. i pulled the car over. please see my pictures below. also, i included the youtube link here for your reference. [xxx] this is a serious safety issue. because the body side's stainless panels are glued on the frame with some kind of adhesive, metal to metal, and the nuts hold the frame to the body. due to the cold temperature and the glued dry up. the stainless panels start falling off. i took a pictures of the new parts to proof that the stainless panel is glued by adhesive to the black frame information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

The contact owns a 2024 tesla cybertruck. the contact stated while driving 49 mph with the full self-driving (fsd) activated, the destination was entered, and the system announced the direction steps and suddenly the full self-driving (fsd) disengaged independently causing the driver to be required to take control of the vehicle. during the independent disengagement of the full self-driving (fsd), the vehicle abruptly accelerated and almost struck another vehicle in a head-on collision. the contact was concerned that the failure could result in a crash if other vehicles were in the opposite direction. on a separate occasion, the contact stated that the full self-driving (fsd) was engaged and driving at various speeds, and the vehicle independently maneuvered into oncoming traffic on a 2-lane road causing the contact to have to take control of the vehicle. a crash was avoided; however, the contact was concerned that if there had been a median barrier it could have resulted in a crash. in addition, the contact stated there was a second occasion where the vehicle was in full self-driving (fsd) and veered into oncoming traffic, and manual control of the vehicle was required. the failure was not recorded via the tesla app. a dealer was contacted, and a service appointment was scheduled for a diagnostic test. the tesla service advisor informed the contact that there was nothing in the systems logs that there was an error, and the dealer was not able to duplicate the failure. the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure several times. the failure mileage was approximately 2,000.

A piece of the stainless steel body trim (right hand roof rail part #1860490-00-c) flew off the car at highway speeds. it looks like it was only held on by glue.

Hello are you still in business or has elon doged you already? no matter.... here's a cybertruck in the junkyard. [xxx] the wheels have gone all whompy. don't suppose you are bothered about it. have a [xxx] day. your friend [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

The stainless steel trim piece above the windows is only attached by glue and comes loose. my front driver side came detached and the rear came loose on both sides. the piece would have completely fallen off and hit another vehicle if had i not noticed it and re attached it with construction adhesive. there is a whole forum about it on the cybertruck owners club linked below. [xxx] information redacted pursuant to the freedom of information act (foia), 5 u.s.c. 552(b)(6)

The contact owns a 2024 tesla cybertruck. the contact stated that while waiting at a railroad track with the full self-driving (fsd) feature activated, the destination was entered, and the railroad lights and gate were lowered when suddenly the full self-driving (fsd) disengaged independently. the traffic light turned green, and the driver was required to take control of the vehicle. during the independent disengagement of the full self-driving (fsd) feature, the vehicle abruptly accelerated. the contact was concerned that the failure might have result in a crash, had he not taken control of the vehicle. the contact stated that he submitted a report through the vehicle app. the vehicle was not taken to the dealer to be diagnosed or repaired. the manufacturer was not notified of the failure. the failure mileage was approximately 3,400.

The contact owns a 2024 tesla cybertruck. the contact stated that while driving at 70 mph with the "full self-driving" (fsd) active, the vehicle ahead of the contact's vehicle abruptly slowed down. the contact began to notice that the vehicle failed to detect the vehicle slowing down and the contact attempted to manually stop the vehicle. the contact crashed into the vehicle which resulted in a three-vehicle collision. the air bags failed to deploy upon impact; as a result, the contact hit her chest on the steering wheel. the contact was taken to the hospital via an ambulance and was treated for neck, back and chest pain. the two other vehicle occupants sustained both neck and back injuries but did not seek medical treatment. the whereabouts of the other drivers were unknown. a police report was filed(report unavailable). the vehicle was initially towed to an independent tow yard. the manufacturer was notified of the failure and later towed the vehicle to an authorized tesla service center where it remained in their possession. the current condition of the vehicle remains unknown. the failure mileage was 5,149.

When the vehicle achieves highway speeds of 65-75 mph, there is a tremendous vibration all over the vehicle. it feels like the tires are coming off and it is difficult to stear and maintain lanes, or control of the vehicle.

The contact owns a 2024 tesla cybertruck. the contact stated that while inspecting the vehicle, the contact discovered that the driver’s side, nine-foot-long stainless steel trim piece located above the doors had become loosened and was not completely secured to the frame of the vehicle. the contact reported the failure using the tesla app, and a service appointment was scheduled. the following day, while driving approximately 75 mph, the trim piece detached from the vehicle onto the freeway. the cause of the failure was not yet determined, and the vehicle was not repaired. the manufacturer and local tesla service center were notified of the failure. the failure mileage was 25,000.

Windshield wiper fell off, tesla was unable to get me an appointment to repair for a month and stating it was wear and tear that made it fall off.

The contact owns a 2024 tesla cybertruck. the contact stated that while driving 80 mph, the rear driver's side quarter panel trim detached. the contact stated that approximately three days later, the contact became aware that the passenger’s side quarter panel trim had detached. the vehicle was taken to the dealer, who diagnosed a failure with the exterior panel adhesive. the vehicle was not repaired. after investigating the failure, the contact related the failure to nhtsa campaign number: 25v170000 (structure). the vin was included, parts were available, but the vehicle had not been repaired. the manufacturer was notified of the failure, and a case was opened. the failure mileage was 22,000.

On taking the exit on the freeway, the accelerator and the brakes were unresponsive and the vehicle took control and no longer responded to the driver's actions. then it hit the sidewalk , the tires bursted and the wind shied cracked. the vehicle drove over the side walk with bursted tires and then it stopped.

The office of defects investigation (odi) is opening a recall query to assess the remedy adequacy of recall 23v838. on december 12, 2023, tesla filed a defect information report (recall 23v838) applicable to all tesla models produced and equipped with any version of its autopilot system, which tesla described as an sae level 2 (l2) advanced driver assistance system (adas). autopilot is the simultaneous engagement of tesla’s traffic-aware cruise control (tacc) and autosteer. in describing the safety defect, tesla’s defect information report (dir) explained that “the prominence and scope of the system’s controls may be insufficient to prevent driver misuse,” and tesla committed to the deployment of a multipart remedy aimed at improving system and engagement controls and reducing mode confusion. ea22002 (upgraded from pe21020) was opened to investigate whether tesla’s autopilot contained a defect that created an unreasonable risk to motor vehicle safety and involved extensive crash analysis, human factors analysis, vehicle evaluations, and assessment of vehicle control authority and driver engagement technologies. the work conducted in these investigations aligns with tesla’s conclusion in its 23v838 recall filing. during ea22002, odi identified at least 13 crashes involving one or more fatalities and many more involving serious injuries in which foreseeable driver misuse of the system played an apparent role. tesla filed recall 23v838 to address concerns regarding the autopilot system investigated in ea22002. following deployment of the remedy in recall 23v838, odi identified concerns due to post-remedy crash events and results from preliminary nhtsa tests of remedied vehicles. also, tesla has stated that a portion of the remedy both requires the owner to opt in and allows a driver to readily reverse it. tesla has also deployed non-remedy updates to address issues that appear related to odi’s concerns under ea22002. this investigation will consider why these updates were not a part of the recall or otherwise determined to remedy a defect that poses an unreasonable safety risk. odi is therefore opening this recall query investigation to further evaluate the adequacy of the remedy for recall 23v838.

The office of defects investigation (odi) has identified four standing general order (sgo) reports in which a tesla vehicle experienced a crash after entering an area of reduced roadway visibility conditions with fsd -beta or fsd -supervised (collectively, fsd) engaged. in these crashes, the reduced roadway visibility arose from conditions such as sun glare, fog, or airborne dust. in one of the crashes, the tesla vehicle fatally struck a pedestrian. one additional crash in these conditions involved a reported injury. the four sgo crash reports are listed at the end of this summary by sgo number. odi has opened a preliminary evaluation of fsd (a system labeled by tesla as a partial driving automation system),which is optionally available in the model year (my) 2016-2024 models s and x, 2017-2024 model 3, 2020-2024 model y, and 2023-2024 cybertruck. this preliminary evaluation is opened to assess: -the ability of fsd’s engineering controls to detect and respond appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions; -whether any other similar fsd crashes have occurred in reduced roadway visibility conditions and, if so, the contributing circumstances for those crashes; and -any updates or modifications from tesla to the fsd system that may affect the performance of fsd in reduced roadway visibility conditions. in particular, this review will assess the timing, purpose, and capabilities of any such updates, as well as tesla’s assessment of their safety impact. sgo report numbers: 13781-8004, 13781-7181, 13781-7381, 13781-7767. to review the sgo reports prompting this investigation, go to nhtsa.gov.