Justices Reject Bid to Halt Air Bag Suit [1997-99 Chevy Malibu, Olds Cutlass]
The Center for Auto Safety is the nation’s premier independent, member driven, non-profit consumer advocacy organization dedicated to improving vehicle safety, quality, and fuel economy on behalf of all drivers, passengers, and pedestrians.
The Supreme Court lets stand a lower court ruling that allows a nationwide class-action case against GM to move forward in Oklahoma.
From Bloomberg News
October 12, 2005
General Motors Corp., the world’s largest automaker, lost a U.S. Supreme Court bid to stop a lawsuit contending that 420,000 cars were equipped with air bags that might deploy unnecessarily.
The justices, without comment, refused to disturb a lower court ruling that lets a nationwide class-action lawsuit go forward in an Oklahoma state court. The lawsuit concerns Chevrolet Malibu and Oldsmobile Cutlass cars assembled in GM’s Oklahoma City plant from 1997 to 1999.
Detroit-based GM argued in court papers filed in Washington that Oklahoma courts were unconstitutionally "overriding the regulatory decisions of sister states" by considering the legal claims of consumers around the country.
Lawyers for the consumers urged the Supreme Court not to get involved, pointing to a 2005 federal law that changed many of the rules for future class-action suits.
That law "significantly diminishes the importance of the issues presented in the petition," argued a lawyer for the consumers, Edward D. Robertson Jr. of Jefferson City, Mo.
The consumers say that a software glitch, later corrected by GM, makes their air bags prone to deploy inadvertently, potentially causing serious injury or death. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigated the issue in 1999 and decided no action was warranted.
In letting the case go forward, a state trial judge said that changing the software would cost about $500 per car, or $210 million for the entire class. An Oklahoma appeals court upheld the decision to let the case proceed as a class action.
The Supreme Court last year rejected an appeal raising almost identical issues in an Oklahoma air bag case involving DaimlerChrysler.